Having been in teacher education for almost three decades, I confess to a level of cynicism when it comes to university-based professional prep programs. Publicly, we’re challenged keep improving the quality of the next generation of teachers, yet simultaneously handicapped with expectations to meet rules and regulations almost guaranteed to ensure failure. It’s sort of a “we want you to do a better job, but you have to do it this way rather than a different way that would make more sense.”

Not long ago, I read about a state legislator’s effort to address the growing teacher shortage by creating alternative pathways to certification. I scowled. Even assuming admirable intentions, for those of us who’ve spent years actually struggling to prepare teachers, it’s a dumb idea. Sure, we can solve the teacher shortage problem this way. What could be easier? Just lower the standards for becoming a teacher. Set the bar at perhaps graduating from high school and teaching’s going to attract those otherwise destined for minimum wage jobs. There’ll be no teacher shortage. Problem solved. What’s next? Maybe it’s time to run for Congress or become a Presidential candidate?
Just as obesity is merely a symptom of inactivity and poor lifestyle choices, the teacher shortage has a lot more to do with unattractive salaries, stressful work conditions, little support, and frustrating bureaucratic interference. There’s no shortage of people interested in teaching careers. The problem is that we lose most of them in the first few years of their careers when they discover teaching’s a lot harder than it looks, support isn’t there when it’s needed, and too frequently our professional programs haven’t done a good job preparing new teachers with the skills they need to succeed and flourish.





